PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES
Town Hall,
Chairperson Bellmer called the
meeting to order at
PRESENT: Chairperson Alvin Bellmer, Planning Commissioners’ Charles Lewis,
Michael Van Dyke, Dennis Jochman, Harold Pelton, Kris Koeppe, and
Richard Ratchman
(*arrived at
Director George Dearborn and Associate Planner Jeffrey Smith.
ALSO PRESENT: David Schwartzbauer
Lee Martin
Lynn Martin
Richard Pataska
John Zaborsky
Mike Barth
Gary Zahringer
David Eisele
Approval of Minutes –
Motion by Commissioner Van Dyke seconded
by Commissioner Pelton, to approve the minutes of the Planning Commission
meeting on
1. Rezoning – Richard Pataska
– 1105
Director Dearborn stated how Town staff recommended that the applicant apply
for a rezoning from B-3 (General Business) to B-2 (Community Business) in
order for the proposed addition to meet the minimum street setback requirement.
A variance application under the B-3 district would not meet the variance criteria.
The proposed addition would now meet the minimum 30 ft. street setback for the
B-2 zoning district.
Commissioner Jochman commended Town staff on coming up with a solution to
correct the problem with the variance application.
Motion by Chairperson Bellmer, seconded by Commissioner Van Dyke, to
approve the Rezoning from B-3 to B-2 as submitted. Motion carried with 6 Aye,
1 Excused.
Chairperson Bellmer, Commissioners’ Lewis, Van Dyke, Pelton, Jochman, Koeppe Aye; Commissioner Ratchman Excused.
2. Preliminary Plat –
Martenson & Eisele, Inc. – Shady Springs Estates VI - (008-0223)
Director Dearborn described how the preliminary plat was
proposing 13 new single-family lots. Also, Director Dearborn noted that
The conditions of the preliminary plat were as follows:
Chairperson Bellmer inquired about the road width requirement. Associate Planner Smith explained that the Town required a 28 ft. paved road with two 30 inch curbs, for a total of 33 ft. This standard was preferred by the Street Superintendent and a reduced width would not be desirable.
Mike Barth,
John Zaborsky,
Commissioner Jochman explained that he talked with some
nearby residents, who now felt that the complete extension of
Motion by Commissioner Pelton, seconded by Commissioner Lewis, to approve the Preliminary Plat, with the specified conditions. Motion carried with 6 Aye, 1 Excused.
Chairperson Bellmer, Commissioners’ Lewis, Van Dyke, Pelton, Jochman, Koeppe Aye; Commissioner Ratchman Excused.
3. Rezoning– Davel Engineering Inc. – McGann
Acres - (008-0156-09)
Director Dearborn stated that the applicant was proposing a rezoning from A-2 (General Farming) to R-2 (Single-Family Suburban) for a new 7 lot single-family subdivision. The final plat was approved at the prior meeting.
Motion by Commissioner Jochman, seconded by Commissioner Van Dyke, to approve the Rezoning from A-2 to R-2 as submitted. Motion carried with 6 Aye, 1 Excused.
Chairperson Bellmer, Commissioners’ Lewis, Van Dyke, Pelton, Jochman, Koeppe Aye; Commissioner Ratchman Excused.
4. Certified Survey Map –
Director Dearborn explained that the CSM would split one lot
into two new R-2 (Single-Family) lots.
Lynn Martin,
Concerning access to the new lots, Director Dearborn stated
that
Commissioner Jochman posed an alternative access option,
which involved the property owner granting an easement that would allow access
to both lots from either
Motion by Commissioner Pelton, seconded by Commissioner Van Dyke, to approve the CSM as submitted. Motion carried with 6 Aye, 1 Excused.
Chairperson Bellmer, Commissioners’ Lewis, Van Dyke, Pelton, Jochman, Koeppe Aye; Commissioner Ratchman Excused.
5. Certified
Survey Map – Martenson & Eisele, Inc. –
Director Dearborn stated the CSM would create two new lots from an existing unplatted lot. Director Dearborn then pointed out many natural conditions, such as floodplains, wetlands, and a navigable stream that would limit the amount of development area on each new lot.
Motion by Commissioner Pelton, seconded by Commissioner Lewis, to approve the CSM as submitted. Motion carried with 6 Aye, 1 Excused.
Chairperson Bellmer, Commissioners’ Lewis, Van Dyke, Pelton, Jochman, Koeppe Aye; Commissioner Ratchman Excused.
6. Text Amendments to the
Director Dearborn briefly listed some of the proposed zoning text amendments, such as: signage, appeals process for Conditional Use Permits, and correcting errors in wetland mapping. Director Dearborn did emphasize that Town staff caused the County to initiate some of these changes based on finding fallacies in County staff interpretations or discovering language that was not actually specified in the ordinance format.
Motion by Commissioner Pelton, seconded by Commissioner Jochman, to approve the text amendments as submitted. Motion carried with 6 Aye, 1 Excused.
Chairperson Bellmer, Commissioners’ Lewis, Van Dyke, Pelton, Jochman, Koeppe Aye; Commissioner Ratchman Excused.
OLD ITEMS OF BUSINESS
1. Variance – Richard Pataska –
Director Dearborn reported to the Commission that the
applicant has provided a written request to withdraw the variance since the
rezoning to B-2 now corrected any problem with the minimum street setback
requirement for the proposed addition.
OTHER BUSINESS
1. Comprehensive Plan Update - Implementation Measures
Jon Bartz, the consultant for the Town, described in detail the portion of the Implementation Element that dealt with level of service standards. Mr. Bartz explained that there were standards adopted by the East Central Region Planning Commission for residential land use density, wastewater flow for commercial/industrial, and transportation. Some details of each are as follows:
1. Residential Density Standards:
· Infrastructure (sewer, water, storm sewer, street, park) –levels must be complied with
· Services (police, fire, schools, etc.) – levels are recommended.
· The High Density Standard adopted by East Central is defined a 3 units or more per acre. The entire Town then falls under this category and therefore it must comply with them. If the Town does not comply, then East Central will deny sewer service area extensions.
2. Commercial/Industrial Standards:
· The Town should comply with the highest standard (Category H) which is defined as industrial & commercial development with projected daily wastewater flow rate of 10,000 or more gallons.
In applying these standards, municipalities can be flexible. But these level of service standards are designed to prevent urban sprawl.
3. Transportation Standards:
· Level C is the desirable level of service = stable yet restricted traffic flow, interaction with other transportation systems. Factors affecting Level C standards include: capacity, average speed, number of turns, number of access points, level of visibility, and adjacent land uses.
·
The Town will need to conduct traffic counts and
make other observations to make sure that specific collectors, such as
·
The Town may also want to incorporate pedestrian
access with these roads when addressing compliance with the transportation
standards.
ADJOURNMENT:
Motion by Commissioner Pelton, seconded by Commissioner Lewis,
to adjourn the meeting at
Respectfully submitted,
Jeffrey Smith
Associate Planner