PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES
Town Hall,
Chairperson Bellmer called the
meeting to order at
PRESENT: Chairperson Alvin Bellmer, Planning Commissioners’ Charles Lewis,
Michael Van Dyke, Dennis Jochman (*arrived at
Pelton, Kris Koeppe, and Richard Ratchman. Community Development
Director George Dearborn and Associate Planner Jeffrey Smith.
ALSO PRESENT: Tom Beck
Mike Vanden Heurel
Brent Braun
David Schwartzbauer
Bob Liedl
Bob Ramsey
Dan Hoel
Patrick Medo
Richard LaFond
Paul Beuther
Joe Kaufman
Larry Fredrick
Carol Fredrick
Cormac McInnis
Jack Klein
Terry Barwick
John Gabbey
Bert Stitt
Approval of Minutes –
Motion by Commissioner Pelton, seconded
by Chairperson Bellmer, to approve the minutes of the Planning Commission
meeting on
1. Certified Survey Map –
Martenson & Eisele, Inc. –
Director Dearborn explained that the CSM would slightly adjust the lot line for a
previously approved CSM that created two new R-2 (Single-Family) lots. This
would then allow the construction of two new single-family homes. Chairperson
Bellmer clarified that the CSM was only adjusting the lot line by 5.74 feet.
Motion by Chairperson Bellmer, seconded by Commissioner Van Dyke, to approve
CSM as submitted. Motion carried with 6 Aye, 1 Excused.
Chairperson Bellmer, Commissioners’ Lewis, Van Dyke, Pelton, Koeppe, Ratchman Aye; Commissioner Jochman Excused.
2. Certified Survey Map –
Martenson & Eisele, Inc. –
Director Dearborn stated that the CSM would split one lot
into two newly created lots.
Motion by Chairperson Bellmer, seconded by Commissioner Pelton, to approve the CSM as submitted. Motion carried with 6 Aye, 1 Excused.
Chairperson Bellmer, Commissioners’ Lewis, Van Dyke, Pelton, Koeppe, Ratchman Aye; Commissioner Jochman Excused.
3. Certified Survey Map – Martenson &
Eisele, Inc. –
Director Dearborn reported to the Commission that the CSM
would create two new lots from three existing lots.
Motion by Commissioner Pelton, seconded by Commissioner Lewis, to approve the CSM as submitted. Motion carried unanimously.
4. Rezoning – Martenson & Eisele, Inc. –
Director Dearborn stated that the subject property was proposed to be rezoned from A-2 (General Farming) to R-5 (Planned Residential) for a single-family condominium project. The R-5 zoning allows for unique tools, such as a zero street setback, in order to promote open space and to cluster units. The rezoning to R-5 then also requires a conditional use permit, which is the next agenda item.
Motion by Commissioner Lewis, seconded by Commissioner Pelton, to approve the rezoning from A-2 to R-5 as submitted. Motion carried unanimously.
5. Conditional Use
Permit – Martenson & Eisele, Inc. – (008-0235-04)
Director Dearborn stated that the applicant recently submitted a revised plan for the single-family detached condominium project. The original project proposed two cul-de-sacs and the new plan now has the road looping around and connecting. The original plan would have required sprinklers since there would be two long cul-de-sacs. The revised plan would not require sprinklers, even though they would still be desired by Town staff, since the road would be looped around. The developer is proposing private roads and Director Dearborn stressed that the Town would want them dedicated to the public, especially since they would have to be constructed to Town specifications. There are 46 units proposed that average from 1,800 to 2,000 sq. ft. Director Dearborn explained that these units would most likely be targeted for seniors (retirement age) and be owner occupied as required by the private covenants.
Director Dearborn briefly described how both the wetlands and navigable stream on the property limit the amount of development area but does lend itself towards an R-5 cluster planned unit development. The density of the project would be 2.7 units an acre, which was common for R-2 single-family developments. Furthermore, the units would be priced in the upper $170,000 to mid $180,000 range.
Chairperson Bellmer questioned if the property to the east was developable and Director Dearborn stated that the property had no access to a public road and was further limited by the existing wetlands.
Bob Ramsey, the developer, desired an internal public road but explained that County zoning limitations may not allow it. Director Dearborn and Associate Planner Smith did interpret the R-5 zoning district to allow for a zero street setback for either a private or public road.
Richard Lafond,
Jack Klein,
Mike Vandenheuvel,
Director Dearborn described how single-family condominiums were similar to single-family platted subdivisions in that they either could be sold or rented. But the developer most likely would have restrictive covenants that would not allow the units to be rented. In addition, Director Dearborn explained how the densities of condo’s and single-family were similar (typically 3-5 units an acre) and an advantage of the R-5 condominium project was that the Town could regulate the design and type of units in the development. Commissioner Jochman concurred with the density issue by explaining that the proposal was 2.7 units an acre and a single-family platted subdivision could have up to 5 units an acre.
Larry Fredrick,
Commissioner Jochman pointed out that the Town’s Comprehensive
Plan has been identifying the need for reconstructing
Paul Beuther,
Carol Fredrick,
Terry Barwick,
Commissioners’ Lewis and Ratchman then briefly described how
the traffic flow on
Brent Braun,
After discussing and hearing the various comments on the project, the Commissioners listed the changes and additions that would be needed to staff’s recommended conditions of approval for the CUP. The revised conditions are as follows:
1. A drainage plan, with calculation, is submitted to the Town Engineer for approval.
2. Details of the design and façade of the units are provided to Town staff for review and approval.
3. A detailed site plan is submitted to Town staff for review and approval.
4.
5. The dedicated public roads and cul-de-sacs shall meet Town specifications.
6.
7.
There shall be pedestrian access from
8. The project complies with all other federal, state, and local regulations.
Motion by Commissioner Lewis, seconded by Commissioner Pelton, to approve the CUP, with the specified conditions. Motion carried unanimously.
6. Rezoning –
Director Dearborn stated that the Spring Rd. Elementary was
proposing to construct an outdoor shelter on a separate parcel. Since the
separate parcel and a few other adjacent parcels were zoned R-2 (Suburban
Single-Family), they would have to be rezoned to P-1 (
Tom Beck, representing the
Motion by Commissioner Jochman, seconded by Commissioner Van Dyke, to approve the rezoning from R-2 to P-1 as submitted. Motion carried unanimously.
7. Final Plat – Davel Engineering – McGann Acres
–
Director Dearborn briefly discussed the revisions that were made to the final plat. For example, the existing garage within the environmental corridor could remain since the property owner received a valid Town and County permit for it before Mudd Creek was identified as navigable by the Department of Natural Resources.
The conditions on the final plat are as follows:
1.
A
drainage plan, with calculations, is submitted to the Town Engineer for
approval.
2.
Outlot
1 is attached to the adjacent residential property.
3.
The
property is rezoned from A-2 (General Farming) to R-2 (Suburban Single-Family).
4.
Approval
of all agencies and all other governmental entities with authority to object to
a plat.
Motion by Commissioner Pelton, seconded by Commissioner Lewis, to approve the Final Plat, with the specified conditions. Motion carried unanimously.
8. Certified Survey Map – Davel Engineering –
Director Dearborn stated that the McGann Acres final plat
had an outlot that would not be acceptable to the Town or
Motion by Commissioner Jochman, seconded by Chairperson Bellmer, to approve the CSM as submitted. Motion carried unanimously.
9. Final Plat – Davel Engineering – 2nd
Addition to High Plain Meadows – (008-0169[p])
Director Dearborn reported to the Commission that the applicant provided the final plat for the last extension of High Plain Meadows. The required revisions, such as clarifying the drainage and utility easements, were provided on the final plat.
The conditions on the final plat were as follows:
1.
A
drainage plan, with calculations, is submitted to the Town Engineer for
approval. If a berm is proposed, then it must be clearly identified on the
drainage plan.
2.
Fencing
or some other form of secure barrier shall be placed along the northern portion
of the plat that is adjacent to an active quarry. This will to ensure that access is limited to
this property.
3.
Approval
of all agencies and all other governmental entities with authority to object to a plat.
Motion by Commissioner Pelton, seconded by Commissioner Van Dyke, to approve the Final Plat, with the specified conditions. Motion carried unanimously.
OLD ITEMS OF BUSINESS
OTHER BUSINESS
Bert Stitt explained that he was working with a firm, PDI, on the recent update to the County Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Stitt was mainly hired to deal with the conflicts arising between the urban and rural communities. One such conflict technique would involve problem-solving workshops.
Director Dearborn reported that the Town CUP for the proposed strip mall would come back to the Planning Commission at a future meeting.
ADJOURNMENT:
Motion by Commissioner Lewis, seconded by Commissioner Van
Dyke, to adjourn the meeting at
Respectfully submitted,
Jeffrey Smith
Associate Planner