***TOWN OF
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
MUNICIPAL COMPLEX -
CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson
Bellmer called the Planning Commission Meeting of
PRESENT: Chairperson: Alvin Bellmer
Commissioners: Dennis Jochman Kris Koeppe
Terry Buck Michelle Schaetz Michael Van Dyke
Staff: George
Dearborn, Community Development Director
Mark Mommaerts, Associate Planner
Lucas Telfer, Deputy Assessor
Lori Jencks, Building Inspector
EXCUSED: None
ABSENT: 1 Commissioner position
is vacant
ALSO PRESENT: Robert McBriar Marta Andrew Tom
Shepeck Scot Grishaber
Russ Handevidt Bill Degeneffe Scott Behren Joe Nemecek
Barb Hanson
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
The
minutes of
The minutes of
COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS
The cost-benefit table for
April shows that there is a positive cost-benefit as the commercial &
industrial pays for residential developments.
NEW ITEMS OF BUSINESS:
Department of Community Development Director George Dearborn introduced
the item.
Scott Behren of Jump N Jive Java stated that
the white in the Java will be yellow.
MOTION: Commissioner Jochman, seconded
by Commissioner Schaetz to approve the Sign witht eh notice of the change in
the sign color Motion
carried unanimously.
Department of Community Development Director George Dearborn introduced
the item.
MOTION: Chairperson Bellmer, seconded by Commissioner Buck to approve the Certified Survey Map with the following conditions:
·
All taxes and assessments shall be paid prior to the
Town affixing signatures on the Certified Survey Map.
Motion carried unanimously.
Department of Community Development Director George Dearborn introduced
the item.
Chairperson Bellmer asked about the ordinary high water mark and if all
parties agreed to where that line is located.
Director Dearborn stated that the County and the DNR verify the ordinary
high water mark and that the Town did not measure the distance between the deck
and the ordinary high water mark but the applicant stated in his application
that it is 53 feet.
Martha Andrews, of
Russ Handevidt, the applicant, of
Chairperson Bellmer asked when the original deck was removed and if there
was a permit for a deck in 1998.
Mr. Handevidt responded that it was removed in 1984 and that he got
information from the County that said that if the deck was cut off then he
cant put it back up. He clarified that
the original deck floor was supported by the floor joists of the house and that
they cantilevered out 7 feet. He also
stated that there were too numerous remodeling items to list on the permit.
Director Dearborn stated that the files show no permit for a deck, but
there was a permit issued for siding and for roofing.
Chairperson Bellmer asked if the County required permits for the siding
or roofing.
Director Dearborn stated that the County requires a zoning permit if
anything is be changed to the site or the footprint of the building. The variance is for a lack of a zoning permit
for a deck, not the deck itself and that the County is the final authority.
Chairperson Bellmer stated that the photos show what appears to be a 10
foot deck with supports.
Mr. Handevidt stated that he cannot cantilever the deck because of the
floor joists.
Chairperson Bellmer asked why he added the additional 3 feet to the deck.
Mr. Handevidt replied that it was so he could use the deck better and
place a table and chairs on it.
Commissioner Jochman asked about the 1998 permit and if the applicant had
a zoning permit or inspection records.
Commissioner Schaetz asked who Lenny was.
Director Dearborn replied that Len was the former Building Inspector who
left in 2001.
Commissioner Schaetz stated that the variance is for the shoreland zoning
setback, not the deck.
Director Dearborn responded that it is a setback issue.
Commissioner Schaetz stated that the setback is something that needs to
be addressed and that the house is probably grandfathered in.
Director Dearborn stated that the Town has choosen to make
recommendations to the County for variances, but the County doesnt have to
follow the Towns recommendation.
Mr. Handevidt stated that he followed information given to him by staff
and by the County and now he is paying for it.
Director Dearborn replied that if there was an error, it is unfortunate,
but it does not make it right and that there is no evidence that there was an
error as Mr. Handevidt stated.
Ms. Andrews asked the Building Inspector how long a permit is good for.
Lori Jencks, Town Building Inspector, stated that at that time, permits
were good for 2 years.
Ms. Andrews stated that there is no evidence that the aerials are wrong.
Director Dearborn stated that staff will verify the dates of the aerials.
Ms. Andrews stated that the deck should have been completed in 2000 if
the permit was pulled in 1998, but the 2000 aerial does not show that.
Mr. Handevidt stated that he does not have any evidence that a permit was
taken out, but that he does not lie and he stated that he took out a
permit. He stated that Lenny told him
that he could do it. He also stated that
he can bring witnesses to confirm the 1998 completion date.
Commissioner Jochman noted the correspondence dated November of 2004,
January of 2005 and February of 2005 from the County stating that a variance
must be applied for by March of 2005 and asked what happened to that.
Mr. Handevidt responded that hey was told that a variance was not doable
because it was in County Court action.
He stated that he was told by George not to file a variance. He stated that his attorney told him that if
the Town denied the variance, then the Town will be in court as well.
Director Dearborn stated that staff has no knowledge of County Court
action and that staff will advise applicants of dates and refer them to the
County, not tell them not to file.
Mr. Handevidt stated the he received forms passed on by the Town Clerk
and the Clerk told him that George said he should not apply for a variance.
Commissioner Jochman stated that maybe some of the neighbors should come
in to discuss this.
Chairperson Bellmer asked staff if there were any neighbor comments that
emailed or phoned in. He also stated
that he could understand repairing the original 7 foot deck and can understand
the use, but that some liberty was taken by adding 3 feet. If the deck stayed at 7 feet, then it would
be easier to approve.
Commissioner Schaetz asked if the existing deck meets regulations.
Director Dearborn stated that it has not been inspected.
Mr. Handevidt stated that the application that was filed states 10 feet
because of what was already built. He
also stated that this is not official, but it appears the County would allow a
deck at 7 feet. He also stated that the
deal was not discussed until after the variance was filed, which is why the
application states 10 feet for the deck.
Commissioner Jochman asked if the County will accept the deck at 7 feet.
Director
MOTION: Chairperson
Bellmer, seconded by Commissioner Jochman to deny the Variance as the Variance
does not meet all the criteria for a Variance.
Bill Degeneffe, of Palisades
Properties, asked how this variance would affect anyone else.
Commissioner Schaetz
responded that if there was an exception for one person, then why not the
next. There has to be a precedent set.
Motion carried unanimously.
Department of Community Development Director George Dearborn introduced
the item.
Commissioner Jochman asked the applicants if they were aware of the
conditions.
Director Dearborn responded that they were notified.
Barb Hanson,
Director Dearborn stated Toms Drive In is the only tenant staff is aware
of at this time.
MOTION: Commissioner Jochman, seconded by Commissioner Koeppe to approve the B-5 Conditional Use Permit with the following conditions:
·
A landscaping
Plan be submitted to and approved by the Department of Community Development
·
A 5-foot concrete
sidewalk shall be constructed along
·
All roof-top mechanical
equipment shall be screened from view from traffic on Hwy 10.
·
The applicant
shall submit to Community Development the uses of the tenant spaces for staff
review of appropriateness in the zoning district. Uses deemed questionable by staff shall be
brought before the Plan Commission for approval.
·
If the drive-thru
intends to use speakers then they shall be designed to not direct any sound to
the adjacent properties. No sound from
the operations of any speakers used at the drive thru, or for any other
purpose, shall be heard beyond the property lines. For the purpose of enforcement, any decibel
reading taken at the property lines of the development shall not exceed the
ambient decibel readings found at the property lines.
·
Detailed Site
Plan A detailed site plan meeting the requirements of the Town of Menasha
Site Plan Review Ordinance & WCTCZO Chapter 17.13-B shall be submitted to the Community
Development. The proposal must meet WCTCZO Chapter 17.13-B in its entirety including the following:
Architecture
·
Elevations All
architectural facades shall meet WCTCZO 17.13-B. Architectural
elevations, floor plans, material samples, and color samples shall be submitted
to the Department of Community Development for approval and shall meet WCTCZO
17.13-B in its entirety.
·
Setbacks All
buildings shall meet the required setbacks per WCTCZO Chapter 17.13-B.
Landscaping and Screening
·
Landscaping A
landscaping plan shall be submitted by the applicant that meets or exceeds the
standards of the Town of Menasha Municipal Code Chapter 29 and WCTCZO Chapter
17.13-B.
·
Refuse Storage
Dumpster enclosures shall meet WCTCZO Chapter 17.13-B and shall be submitted to the Department of Community
Development.
·
Services Air
conditioning, gas and electric units shall be identified and screened.
·
Fences No fences are identified. All fences require separate
application and review.
·
Roof Mounted Equipment
Applicant
shall identify RMEs, if any exist, and provide detail on how they will be
screened from view.
·
Open Space The
applicant shall meet WCTCZO 17.13-B regarding 30% open space.
·
FAR (Building
Floor to Site Area Ratio) The applicant shall meet the requirement for FAR
per WCTCZO 17.13-B and submit information to determine the FAR on the
site.
·
Outside Storage
No outside storage of materials shall be allowed. All business, servicing, processing, and
storage shall be conducted within completely enclosed buildings per WCTCZO
17.13-B.
Traffic and Access
·
Parking Parking
shall meet the requirements of WCTCZO 17.26 and 17.13-B.
·
Access Driveway
curb cuts shall require an excavation permit and escrow through the Street
Department.
Streets and Improvements
·
Improvements
All improvements shall meet the Town of
Lighting
·
Lighting All
fixtures including exterior building fixtures shall be direct cut-off
fixtures. Lighting requirements shall
meet WCTCZO 17.13-B.
Stormwater and Erosion Control
·
Stormwater and Erosion Control A
Stormwater and Erosion Control Plan shall meet WCTCZO 17.13-B and Town of Menasha Municipal Code Chapter 31 in its
entirety.
General
·
Signs Any proposed signs
require separate application and review.
·
Accessory
Structures Any future accessory structures or additions will require a new
Town B-5 Conditional Use Permit.
·
Radio and
Television Antennas No antennas are indicated. Radio and Television Antennas
shall meet WCTCZO 17.13-B.
·
Satellite Dishes
No satellite dishes are indicated. Satellite dishes shall meet
WCTCZ 17.13-B.
·
Noxious uses -
Uses that are offensive due to odor, smoke, fumes, dust, noise, vibration,
radioactive emissions, pollution, or excessive danger of fire or explosion
shall not be allowed, per WCTCZO 17.13-B.
Fire Protection
·
Fire Protection
The applicant shall meet all requirements of Town Ordinances on Fire Projection
and all other applicable fire codes.
Utilities
·
Utilities The
location of all utilities shall be submitted by the applicant. The applicant shall meet all requirements of
the Town of
Commissioner Schaetz asked if
the developer was going to supply bike racks.
Director Dearborn stated that
the Commission could condition that bike racks be provided.
Scot Grishaber, of Mainstreet
Partnership, stated that they could provide bike racks near the Toms end of
the building and possible some other spots as well.
Chairperson Bellmer asked if
the shared driveway lines up with the Express driveway across the street. He also asked the developer if they were
going to extend the shared driveway to the southern property as well.
Mr. Grishaber stated that
would depend on the type of development to the south.
Commissioner Jochman
suggested that the developer should reconsider the dumpster location if they
plan to extend the driveway.
Motion carried unanimously.
Department of Community Development Director George Dearborn introduced
the item.
Chairperson Bellmer stated that it looks like the Preliminary Plat.
Director Dearborn stated that there are minor revisions to
MOTION: Chairperson
Bellmer, seconded by Commissioner Van Dyke to approve the Final Plat called
Jacobsen Meadows with the following conditions:
·
All taxes
and assessments shall be paid prior to the Town affixing signatures on the Final Plat.
·
The
Developers Agreement shall be executed prior to the Town affixing signatures
on the Final Plat.
Motion carried unanimously.
Department of Community Development Director George Dearborn introduced
the item.
Chairperson Bellmer asked if the berm will be on the condo property.
William Degeneffe, of Palisades Properties, stated that the berm will be
on the commercial property (property to the south of the condos).
MOTION: Commissioner Jochman, seconded by Commissioner Schaetz to approve the Conditional Use Permit revision with the following conditions:
·
A berm easement
shall be provided along the northern portion of parcel 008-0040-01, for the
area of the berm, to ensure that proper screening will be in place if the
property is ever sold.
·
An attractive
fence, with a gate, shall be constructed along the gap of the berm to provide
screening between the two developments.
Robert McBriar, of
Mr. Degeneffe responded yes,
but not where it is now. The berm will
start about 20 from the west property line and then continue through the
property to the east. The break in the berm
is so that the Fire Department has access to within 150 of all sides of the
condos.
Chairperson Bellmer asked if
this was the only condo that has this problem.
Mr. Degeneffe responded that
there are more and that fire lanes will be used to resolve those problems.
Mr.
McBriar asked if a fence could be put on the berm to stop kids from riding
their bikes over the berm.
Mr.
Degeneffe stated that he has no trespassing signs posted and the berm will
provide the best screening.
Chairperson
Bellmer asked about maintenance of the berm.
Mr.
Degeneffe stated that the commercial property will maintain the berm.
Motion carried unanimously.
Department of Community Development Director George Dearborn introduced
the item.
MOTION: Commissioner
Van Dyke, seconded by Commissioner Jochman to approve the Condominium Plat with the
following conditions:
Motion carried unanimously.
OLD ITEMS OF BUSINESS:
Department of Community Development Director George Dearborn introduced
the item.
MOTION: Commissioner
Jochman, seconded by Commissioner Schaetz to approve the latest draft of the
amendment to the Land Division Control Ordinance, Chapter 6 of the Municipal
Code. Motion carried unanimously.
OTHER BUSINESS:
COMMUNICATIONS:
ADJOURNMENT:
MOTION: Chairperson
Bellmer, seconded by Commissioner Koeppe to adjourn the meeting of Mary 17,
2006 at
Mark J. Mommaerts
Recording Secretary